Entries by Bradley Price (552)

Friday
Oct012010

Lotus Blossoms in Paris, but what would Colin Think??

Lotus pulled a PR coup at the Paris Auto Show this week with a stunning unveiling of 5 entirely new models! All this with no warning to the press or months of hype preceding it. First, I gotta give a hat tip to their PR folks, because that was such a refreshing return to the old days when an unveiling really was an unveiling! 

As a lifelong fan of this unique British marque, I am pleased to see a robust set of brand new offerings from them. Although Lotus was historically mainly a maker of small volume sports cars, founder Colin Chapman definitely sought to offer a full line of sports and GT cars, but never quite managed to acheive that goal before his untimely death. His devotion to and fixation upon motor racing was a huge distraction from his production cars and they were always short on capital, so there has never been a time in the history of the company when they have had a well-coordinated line of brand new offerings all at once like this. In that respect, I think Colin would be proud of this launch.

Also, none of these cars is ugly, let me say. I happen to think each on is quite nice by itself, though the Elise is a disappointment. The proportions are all good, and there are some really cool idiosyncratic details that belong on a Lotus, like the strange tail light treatment on the Eterne, for example.  The Elan and the Esprit have the cleanest, most purposeful look, but the Eterne and Elite have some very nice GT proportions as well.  There is a good "family look" to the line, but I have to admit that they all look almost too similar. I have a hard time telling the differnce between the Eterne and the Elite front views, for example.  Furthermore, all of these cars look less like Loti to me than what a frustrated Hyundai designer might draw at home in his spare time, wishing his boss would listen to him.  There is something unmistakably Asian about these cars, and they definitely fall into some of the same form and surfacing tricks employed at Toyota and Honda of late.

Yet for those critical of the styling, what should Lotus' new owners have done? Lotus has always been a forward looking company, and any retro touches would have been totally inappropriate. (The L  O  T  U  S  lettering on the trunk lid of the Elite and Eterne is a wonderful subtle nod to the Europa, though!) Furthermore, there has never been a singular Lotus look. With few exceptions, every Lotus road car has had a fairly individual look and style to it.  Lotus under Colin Chapman was always innovative mechanically, but styling-wise followed whatever the prevailing aesthetic current of the time was.  The original Seven, Elite, Elan, and Esprit look nothing like each other, but each epitomizes the look of the time in which it was designed.  In other words, there is no telltale family gene to draw upon, even in the slightest.

The only commonality amongst all the original cars was the ingenuity of Colin Chapman's brilliant chassis design, clever use of advanced materials, and the adherence to his "Add Lightness" philosophy.  Even most of the recent post-Chapman Loti such as the Elise and Exige have adhered piously to the way Colin thought about sports cars.  This is the point where I might say that the new company has now diverged from its founder's vision.  These new cars offer little in the way of unique technical design. Surely they will perform to a high level, but at about twice the curb weight and twice the horsepower that Colin would have deemed necessary, and without any unusual or even bizarre tricks that Colin tried. I suppose the need to become a full-line volume manufacturer causes some compromises, but Colin Chapman was rarely if ever one to compromise his engineering philosophy. What do you all think? Would Colin approve??

Photos via Autoblog

Monday
Sep272010

Summer is over Moment of Zen

The summer concours season is at an end, but at least there is the fall driving season. May each of you enjoy some colorful drives this fall.

Sunday
Sep262010

Monday Morning Muscle Car Mystery

Can you identify this mystery car?

Tuesday
Sep212010

Another modded Healey for your consideration

Continuing this week's theme of modified Austin-Healeys, here is a car currently available on ebay for the tempting sum of 11 Grand.  This Healey 100 was modified in period to have what appears to be a fiberglass nose complete with egg-crate grill. While I feel this modification was detrimental to the car's appearance over the slick chrome grill that came stock, I would be loathe to restore this car back to factory specification. After all, how many of these weird fiberglass noses exist in the world? As a historical artifact, I think this car is more interesting than a stock one, though less beautiful. I am hoping a Healey owner who already has one or two 100's in his garage might buy this one and keep it relatively as-is. There are also supposedly Abarth mods to the engine that pique my curiosity! All in all a very cool, idiosyncratic car that shouldn't be turned back into just another trailer queen.

If you want to buy it, it does come with a replacement Healey 100 nose and many extras. Bid here!

Hat tip to Bring a Trailer.

Monday
Sep202010

This Healey packs a Yankee V8: Divine inspiration, or sacrilege?

At a car show last month, I came across one of the most interesting engine swaps in memory. The owner of this dark red Austin Healey 3000 decided to do a period-accurate V8 conversion on his car, by dropping in a 283 V8 engine from a 1962 Corvette! Now the Austin Healey 3000 had a strong engine to begin with, but this conversion gives 1.6 times the engine displacement of the stock engine, while lowering the weight significantly. Not only that, but the Healey engine was famously tall (it was originally developed as a powerplant for a mail truck!), and this conversion lowers the car's center of gravity enormously, while moving it back, closer to the center of the car. The handling improvement over a stock Healey must be startling!

The most appealing aspect of this conversion is to ponder the historical "what ifs" here. If someone had done this type of conversion back in the day, could the Chevrolet powered Healey have been a rival to the to the Ford powered AC also known as the 289 Cobra? With proper development and funding, a Chevy-Healey could have had quite a sucessful life in competition and sales back in the early 60s, but probably GM's marketing department didn't want to foster competition with their own Corvette offerings. So we'll never know if the sports car market had room for yet another Anglo-American marriage of beauty and brawn. Still, I would love to do a comparison test between this car and a 289 Cobra and see how they stack up alongside one another. For me, the car is prettier than a 289 Cobra, but is it also faster around a track? Click here for more pictures!